Saturday, June 29, 2013

Social Media and Truth


Today, Twitter informed me via Associated Press tweet of a recent detainment by the FDA of imported pomegranates by a particular firm due to a multistate outbreak of Hepatitis A linked to their use in multiple organic fruit blends. I clicked on The Associated Press article to read more of the details surrounding this story at which point I learned that the FDA and CDC were able to determine the source of the outbreak due to the particular food's inclusion in similar products. For instance, several different organic health food fruit blends were obtaining their pomegranate seeds from the same Turkish company, Goknur. I found this to be extremely ironic and quite sad that one of the most expensive fruits that is marketed and sold in the United States is the pomegranate and furthermore, unsuspecting consumers were paying a premium for organic foods that in turn gave them a serious viral infection. Why steer clear of nonorganic foods in fear of ingesting pesticides just to pay more for organic foods and become infected with Hepatitis A? There seemed quite a disconnect and I was intrigued by the process in which this has occurred. 

After reading the AP article on their own web site sent from the Twitter link, I wanted to see of other reports of this same occurrence so I Googled "FDA pomegranate" to find ten different sources (Yahoo! News, NBC News, Boston Herald and foodsafetynews.com to name a few) on results page one reporting the same story, the first being from the FDA itself.


  1. News for fda pomegranate

    natmonitor.com

    1. FDA to detain pomegranate seeds offered for import from Goknur of Turkey


      FDA.gov ‎- 11 hours ago
      The U.S. Food and Drug Administration will detain shipments ofpomegranate seeds from Goknur Gida Maddeleri Ithalat Ihracat Tic [Goknur ...
  2. This got me wondering about the details of Hepatitis A and its level of seriousness so I went to Wikipedia and searched "Hepatitis A" where I read about some of the effects on the body as well as the largely Western eradication of the disease via prevention. Lo and behold, the very last subject was regarding cases and the last listed was the most recent, added today which states:

    1. In June 2013, frozen berries sold by US retailer Costco and purchased by around 240,000 people were the subject of a recall, after at least 118 people were infected with HAV.[35]
    1. ^[35] http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/06/18/hepatitis-a-frozen-berries-118-sick/2434267/

    The separating element between the story on FDA detainment of pomegranates one like the Three Mile Island meltdown story (CNN) is the gravity of events. The reactor meltdown means radiation leakage for possibly thousands of people as well as contaminated water and soil whereas the source of the contaminated pomegranate seeds was already determined and posed no future threat as it could be avoided. The issue with the reactor meltdown is that at that point ... it was out of the hands of the people to prevent.

    The question of "How do you know what you know?" can be interpreted as one of source, "How do you come about finding the things that you know?" or one of validity, "How do you know if what you learned is really true?" The answer lies in the interest of the end-user and how far he or she wants to dig to find it referenced in enough cases to make it more than just a one-off incidence. In this instance, multiple credible news sources were attributed to the broadcasting of this story, all of whom have reputations and obligations to uphold. The only feasible idea as to why this particular story would permeate our preferred search engine, our preferred online encyclopedia and one of the world's biggest forums for social media and still not be true is if it were a case of agenda setting and corruption that would involve the federal government, its agencies and publicly and privately-owned news sources. This is not entirely out of the picture but in weighing its validity and its sources, the offending parties would have to have a serious motivation to commit such acts. 

    Social media can be used to obtain credible information because it is in large, a re-sourcing of information. A re-tweet can be posted by anyone on Twitter but the source is still embedded, they are just helping the information to spread. In such instances, they would normally choose to re-post, re-tweet items that are of personal interest to them. Social media in the regard of credible information is used as a vehicle to transport such ideas. Yes, they are alterable messages, however if the message appears enough times then its consistency will be revealed. 


    References

    The Associated Press (29 June 2013). Retrieved 29 June 2013. http://bigstory.ap.org/article/fda-detain-import-firms-pomegranate-seeds.

    CNN. Pump Triggers Three Mile Island Reactor Shutdown, NRC says. Retreived from http://www.cnn.com/2012/09/20/us/pennsylvania-three-mile-island/index.html.


    Wikipedia (n.d.). Retrieved 29 June 2013. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hepatitis_A

Sunday, June 16, 2013

Concept of Money and Identity

Daily new social media (NSM) I use are without question Facebook but also include Instagram (now Facebook-owned). I am not sure if GroupMe qualifies as a form of new social media, however my entire district's (work-related, eight corporate stores) communication now exists on GroupMe as opposed to email. Could be because of our 200MB Outlook mailbox limit or to our more mobile nature (smartphone vs desktop computer).

New social media has shaped my perspective of events just as it has anyone else's. In sales, it is a long-standing notion that what gets measured gets improved. If literally every media outlet around me that purposely creeps into all aspects of my life has an agenda let alone sales agenda, then I am bound by almost certainty to be influenced under the powers that be. 

The concept of information, sales and technology rule my current disposition despite conscious effort.

I want to know more about Google+ and Color. Facebook is selling me. It is Facebook's intent and reality in addicting me and selling me to internet creations for profit. Given my line of work and my personal experience, I am quite conscious of concepts of identity and sharing. I know about backups and restores, about profiles and linked accounts. Concerning is the wild race to consolidate accounts and all public sense of self. The work and personal is becoming further intertwined. I am worried to speak too much of myself as to give away my whereabouts, preferences and likeness. I am worried that these things that technology now dictates as my public identity will be stolen or misconstrued. We have been witness to the media darling start-ups of the world that create posts bringing awareness to and asking for help in dismantling (reporting) false accounts or likenesses. With invent of screenshots and their utter ease of use, it is nearly impossible not to share items exactly as the way you see them which is what we have been searching for all along. 

While a new social media identity is different than a financial one, they embody similar concepts of money and identity. An anonymous person or computer can hijack my likeness which by nature is uniquely my own and virtual belongings to which I have worked toward. The lines of ownership have blurred in this recent era of technology and wildfire-nature of information spreading. 

There are both positive and negative aspects of this recent wave of change. Positively speaking, end users are more informed than at any point in history before yet negatively speaking are held less accountable. Are things like Wikipedia more "true" because they are created by the people or are the people's opinions that inevitably shape interpretation of facts compromised because of 24-hour media access and arguably, overexposure? We need media and information checks and balances. We cannot forfeit all information ownership rights to corporations so we mediate them ourselves, yet we the people place emphasis and detail on those facts ultimately told to us are important or true. We won't allow ourselves to give up such freedoms to describe and interpret yet we under-question the nature and source of the gospel in which we choose to spread. 

Concept of money and identity - sales, security and self.